manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology

Further information is available from the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC). You can access your manuscript via the 'Live Manuscript' folder at any time during the editorial process. For clinical trials that have not been registered prospectively, authors are encouraged to register retrospectively to ensure the complete publication of all results. (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received). All abbreviations should be fully defined in the text. Addresses will not be updated or changed after publication of the article. Internet Explorer). Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. Incomplete or incorrect information is also likely to result in your paper being rejected. Just after one day, an editor was assigned and the status turned to "Manuscript under consideration". Author A.B. The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. Authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors at submission. The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. Authors should include a statement that confirms that an institutional or independent ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) approved the study and that informed consent was obtained from the donor or next of kin. The portal also provides authors links so that they can quickly register a new resource and obtain an RRID. However, on occasion editors might consult with expert researchers when deciding whether to review a paper. 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 6. Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current. Keep lettering consistently sized throughout your final-sized artwork, usually about 23 mm (812 pt). The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.. Work submitted for publication may have implications for public health or general welfare and in those cases it is the responsibility of all authors to include the appropriate disclosures and declarations. Biochem. The Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned guidelines. How can you help improve your manuscript for publication? Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted. The following statements must be included in your submitted manuscript under the heading 'Statements and Declarations'. Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate). Book reference: 3. Examples of statements to be used when no ethical approval is required/exemption granted: This is an observational study. A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. But since the beginning, the status was "under consideration", until now. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Once typesetting is complete, you will receive a link asking you to confirm your affiliation, choose the publishing model for your article as well as arrange rights and payment of any associated publication cost. Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. The statement should include details of any grants received (please give the name of the funding agency and grant number). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study., Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.. high-impact journals, and shows that manuscripts submitted under DBPR option are less likely to be sent to review and accepted than those submitted under SBPR. Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Methods The study was designed to analyze the manuscripts submitted to Nature-branded journals publishing primary research between March 2015 (when the Nature-branded primary research Data availability statements should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found, if applicable. Review articles present an expert synthesis of evidence and may be treated as an authoritative work on a subject. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript. Short communications should begin with a short abstract of up to 100 words. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. Our Community Voices series aims to highlight the challenges faced by under-represented groups in scientific research and to provide a . Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Upon acceptance, your article will be exported to Production to undergo typesetting. Include the captions in the text file of the manuscript, not in the figure file. Does it mean that my paper was under consideration only in terms of its format, scope etc. this is editorial consideration. All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. In total a short communication should be no longer than 1000 words in length and should contain no more than three to four figures and about 20 references. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. Do not number the appendix figures, "A1, A2, A3, etc." In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Report/Document: 4. Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete. For large-sized journals the figures should be 84 mm (for double-column text areas), or 174 mm (for single-column text areas) wide and not higher than 234 mm. Adding and/or deleting authors at revision stage are generally not permitted, but in some cases it may be warranted. It is strongly recommended to suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions. There are 2 routes to submit a research manuscript to Review Commons: The recommended route is first to post the manuscript as a preprint on bioRxiv or medRxiv. This work was supported by [] (Grant numbers [] and []. *All of the above are guidelines and authors need to make sure to respect third parties rights such as copyright and/or moral rights. Macgregor, S. (1993), PhD thesis, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially; patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by publication of this manuscript. //--> Dear Justyce Quotes, Sheriff Tom Tate Political Party, Articles M